Electronic Criminal Trial Reform That Guarantees Due Process Of Law

Fendy Aditiya Siswa YULIANTO; Bambang SUGIRI

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.273

Authors

Fendy Aditiya Siswa YULIANTO Master of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.
Bambang SUGIRI Master of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.273

Keywords:

Reformulation, Electronic Courts, Proper Legal Process

Abstract

This study examines how the reformulation of electronic criminal trials in Indonesia ensures the correct legal process. The research approach used is normative juridical law research, namely by analyzing several primary kinds of literature such as legislation, and legal theory to the views of scholars. The results obtained from this study are that Indonesia as a state of law certainly in its judicial system must obey the law. Indonesia is currently trying to impose electronic trials in resolving several cases in court through the use of electronic media such as teleconferences. This activity is based on the legislation governing electronic criminal trials such as PERMA Number 1 of 2019, PERMA Number 4 of 2020, the Criminal Code, and other related regulations. This regulation forms the basis for the implementation of electronic trials in Indonesia with the main objective of creating fast, simple, and inexpensive trials. However, the facts on the ground show that the problems that occur related to the implementation of this activity are not only technical problems or facilities and infrastructure but also public doubts about the quality of the results of the trial. This phenomenon also occurs in several countries that enforce electronic courts, such as the United States and the Netherlands. Therefore, there is a need for reformulation of statements in legislation so that it does not only focus on the goal of creating a fast, simple and inexpensive judiciary but also needs to be emphasized to ensure the proper legal process occurs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jaya, I., & Wijanarko, D. S. (2021). Kedudukan Miranda Rules dan Penegakan Hukumnya dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i2.671

Kafrawi, M. F. (2016). Application Of The Miranda Principle In Terms Of Presenting The Legal Counsel For Criminal Suspects In Indonesia. Pattimura Law Journal, 1(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.8

Kharlie, A. T., & Cholil, A. (2020). E-court and e-litigation: The new face of civil court practices in Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(2), 2206-2213.

Kramer, X., Gelder, E. van, & Themeli, E. (2019). e-Justice in the Netherlands: the Rocky Road to Digitised Justice. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, October, 1-20. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167543

Kristanti, E. (2022). Evaluasi Capaian Kinerja Tahun 2020 dalam Penerapan WFH di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Equilibrium: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 19(01), 1. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/Equilibrium

Latifiani, D. (2021). Human Attitude And Technology?: Analyzing A Legal Culture On Electronic Court System In Indonesia (Case Of Religious Court). Jils (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) Volume, 6(1), 157-184. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jils

Listyawati, P. R. (2020). The 2 th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper. In M. Ngazis (Ed.), Democracy In Digital Era: Law Govenance, Sosial and Economic Perspective in Asia, Australia and Dutch (pp. 91-98). The 2 th Proceeding International Conference And Call Paper.

Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Perkembangan Regulasi dan Pelaksanaan Persidangan Online Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Crepido, 02(Juli), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.2.1.46-58

Mahardhika, V. (2022). An Electronic Court in the Perspective Criminal Law Reform. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2021 (IJCAH 2021), 618(Ijcah), 894-898. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211223.154

Mulyana, Y. (2021). Cultural Developments in Electronic Law Enforcement in Criminal Acts of Theory in Indonesia. Journal Sampurasun?: Interdisciplinary Studies for Cultural Heritage, 7(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v7i1.4149

Narrasati, D., Pamungkas, Y., & Elthania, I. N. (2021). Konsep E-Litigation Sebagai Perwujudan Penegakan Indonesia. Legislatif, 4(2), 133-144.

Perbawa, I. K. S. L. P. (2021). The Application of Artificial Intelligence as Evidence in the Court. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 5(2), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijssb.v5i2.36185

Pidada, I. B. A. (2021). Legal Protection of the Rights of the Defendant in Criminal Trials through Electronic Media. Nurani Hukum, 4(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v4i1.11078

Pratiwi, S. J., Steven, S., & Permatasari, A. D. P. (2020). The application of e-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i1.37718

Putra, D. (2020). a Modern Judicial System in Indonesia: Legal Breakthrough of E-Court and E-Legal Proceeding. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 9(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297

Putrijanti, A., & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2021). Indonesia Administrative E-Court Regulation Toward Digitalization and E-Government. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 96-111. https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/818 https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.796

Rahman, K. (2021). Modernisasi Persidangan Perkara Pidana Pasca Diterbitkannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Administrasi Dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss4.art5

Safiranita, T., Waluyo, T. T. P., Calista, E., Ratu, D. P., & Ramli, A. M. (2021). The Indonesian Electronic Information and Transactions Within Indonesia's Broader Legal Regime: Urgency for Amendment? Jurnal HAM, 12(3), 533. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.533-552

Sherlock, M. F., Crandall-Hollick, M. L., Driessen, G. A., Gravelle, J., & Marples, D. J. (2020). The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) ActTax Relief for Individuals and Businesses (Vol. 1). https://crsreports.congress.gov

Sitompul, J. (2018). Improving the Role of Experts under Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Lessons Learned From the Dutch Legal System. Indonesia Law Review, 8(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v8n1.385