Ethnographic Communications of the Ngaben Ritual of Bali Hindus in Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i2.471Keywords:
Ngaben, Ritual and Socio-Cultural CommunicationAbstract
Hindus believe that Ngaben facilitates and speeds up the process of liberating the soul of the sarira (smooth body) and the stula of the sarira (rough body). The Ngaben held in DKI Jakarta is different from Hindus in Bali. The aim of the research is to reveal the values contained in each pitra yadnya/Ngaben ceremony, especially for Hindus in North Jakarta. That its implementation is based on Vedic teachings, very flexible/adjustable to local conditions (Village, Kala, Patra). The Ngaben ceremony is a ritual that must be carried out even in overseas areas, according to local conditions and alignment of intent communications. The research was planned using a constructivist paradigm with a qualitative research methodology and an ethnographic research design of communication. In this approach, the researcher collects data and information through in-depth interviews and participatory observation from various sources who have knowledge and experience in implementing Ngaben in North Jakarta. The main focus is related to the use of verbal and non-verbal symbols used in the Ngaben ritual. The theoretical basis used by researchers is ritual communication and socio- cultural theory. The Ngaben ceremony held by the Banjar Hindu community in North Jakarta has a very high social aspect. The number of stages and series of ceremonies and the number of ceremonial equipment used to create social interaction in the ritual.
Downloads
References
Kiriana, IN. 2017. Ngaben Conception in Lontar Siwa Tatta Purana. Vidyottama
Sanatama, International Journal of Hindu Sciences and Religious Studies.
Institute Hindu Darma Negeri, Denpasar, Vol.1 No.2. Hal 84-92,
http://ejournal.ihdn.ac.id/index.php/IJ HSRS/article/view/312/0
Wahyuningsih. (2017). Aspek-Aspek Psikologis pada Prosesi Rambu Solo’ (Tinjauan Teori Religiusitas). Aspek-Aspek Psikologis Pada Prosesi Rambu Solo’ (Tinjauan Teori
Religiusitas), 16.
lee. (2017). ’Sugars, Sweet Taste Receptors, Brain Responses. 9.
Manafe. (2011). Komunikasi Ritual pada Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto di Timor – Nusa Tenggara Timur. 1.
Kebayantini, Ni Luh Nyoman. 2010. “Komodifikasi Upacara Ngaben Gotong Royong di Geriya Tamansari Lingga, Kelurahan Banyuasri, Kabupaten Buleleng”. Disertasi. Denpasar : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Udayana.
Kim, Y. Y. (2011). Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Budi Aksara
Susanto, Sarwiprasodjo dan (2014). Komunikasi Ritual Kanuri Blang sebagai Bentuk Kebersamaan Masyarakat Tani Kecamatan Samatiga Kabupaten Aceg Barat Provinsi Aceh. 12.
Ida Pandita MPU Jaya Wijayanda. (2004). Makna Filosofis Upacara dan Upakara. Paramita
James W. Carey. (1992). Communication as Ritual. Psychology Press.
Carey, James W. 1992. Communication as Culture : Essays on Media and Society. New York : Routledge.
Manafe, Yermia, Djefri. (2011). Komunikasi Ritual pada Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto di Timor-Nusa Tenggara Timur, Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol 1 No.3 Aspikom, Jakarta.
Ni Nyoman Kiriana. (2017). konsep Ngaben dalam Lontar Siwa Tattwa Purana. vol 1, 84–92
Mulyana, Deddy, 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moon, W. J. (2012). Rituals and Symbols In Community Development. Missiology: An Internasional Review, 40:141. Sage Publications.
Salim, Agus. (2006). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana.
Kim, Y. S. (2012). Exploring Communication competence and psychological health: Exploring cross-cultural adaptation of Korean expatriate workers in the U.S.The Journal of Intergroup Relations, 28, 33–47.
Kim, Y. S. (2012). Exploring communication competence and psychological health: A study of cross-cultural adaptation among young Korean immigrants (1.5ers) in the U.S. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 28, 4, Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr28/kim.htm
Kim, Y. (2015). Finding a “home” beyond culture: The emergence of intercultural personhood in the globalizing world. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 46, 3–12.
doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.018.
Kim, Y. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2004). The role of host environment in cross-cultural adaptation: A comparison of American expatriates in South Korea and their Korean counterparts in the United States. Asian Communication Research, 3, 5–25.
Agus Salim. (2006). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Bryman, A. (2008). Of Methods and Methodology, Vol 3.
Denzin & Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Gulo, W. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Widiarsa Indonesia.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundation in Sociolinguistics : An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia : University of Pensylvania Press.
Kuswarno, E. (2008). Etnografi Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Bogor : Widya Padjadjaran.
M. Iqbal Hasan. (2002). Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta : Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
Margono, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Rineka Cipta.
Moh. Nazir. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
N Zuriah. (2007). Metodologi penelitian sosial dan pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.
Nurul Zuriah. (2007). Metode Penelitian Sosial dan Pendidikan.Jakarta: Bumi aksara.
I Ketut Wiana. (2004). Bagaimana Umat Hindu Menghayati Tuhan. jakarta: Pustaka Manik
Geni.
I Made Titib. (2006). Persepsi Umat Hindhu di BValuTerhadap Suarga, Neraka , Moksa dalam Suargarohani parwa. Surabaya:paramita.
SANDERSON, S. K. (2000). Makro sosiologi: Sebuah pendekatan terhadap realitas sosial. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ketut PATERA, Mirza RONDA, Mikhael DUA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
